Iraqi backing of Obama plan irks White House

Personal Liquor Filter

This filter actually works great!
Get one and save money. You're going to need it. read more...
Pages
Categories
Blogroll
Candidates Sites
Archives
Meta

Search

Bloggers, Make Money$$

Got empty Adspace? Monetize it. Use COPEAC's Affiliate Program Put it in your ad rotation. Much easier than CJ
RSS

Subscribe in a reader
Subscribe by email
Friends

----- No Hillary 2008 Find out the truth about Hillary
Sponsored Ads
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Anonymous: I e-mailed my congressman at about 9 pm on the evening of the election to request tickets. I booked...
- luteragzfer: Mike Mossberg, I know you reading this forum, please contact me, because I can’t find your contact...
- anon: I want to know what Reverend Wright has said about the attacks. India’s chickens coming home to roost?...
- Jason: With the Treasury Secretary on his spending spree he surely isn’t trying to get a good return on the tax...
- movie fan: If Palin runs for President in 2012, at least she has name recognition going for her… but that may...
- Francesco: Just to say that Gay marrage is not right, it should be stop Then gay sex is wrong all togeather, I know I...
- movie fan: it’s awesome that there has been this “problem” of long lines all over… people...
- kevin jacobs: Great change is going to take place in this country if we all work together to achieve it. Obama has...
- RobertJ: Guess God wanted Obama to win. Or, she’s lying when she claims to know God’s mind. Hmm.
- Jonathan HR dude: So many people are freaking out about the economy but I still see thousands of jobs posted on...

Iraqi backing of Obama plan irks White House

July 21st, 2008 Presidential-Race.net Posted in In the News |

Tags: Barack Obama, Iraq, lead, media, U.S., video, war, Withdrawal

The White House expressed unhappiness Monday about Iraqi leaders’ public backing for Barack Obama’s troop withdrawal timetable. And it said that Baghdad may be trying to use the U.S. presidential election as leverage in talks about the future of American’s military presence and obligations in the war.