Search


NWO Sheep Herder – The New World Order

December 6th, 2008 Presidential-Race.net Posted in Contributors No Comments »

You can’t just print money day and night and get away without some serious inflation, as well you think they care about unemployment rates at all time highs, no, its just another thing they lie about (actual numbers are higher) to help fight inflation.

There’s the exploding budget deficit and the ballooning bailout commitments of the U.S. Treasury. By my count the U.S. government has loaned, invested or committed.

* $200 billion to nationalize the world’s two largest mortgage companies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac;
* $25 billion for the Big Three auto manufacturers;
* $29 billion for Bear Stearns;
* $150 billion for AIG;
* $350 billion for Citigroup;
* $300 billion for the Federal Housing Administration rescue bill to refinance bad mortgages;
* $87 billion to pay back JPMorgan Chase for bad Lehman Brothers trades;
* $200 billion in loans to banks under the Fed’s Reserve Term Auction Facility (TAF);
* $50 billion to support short-term corporate IOUs held by money market mutual funds;
* $500 billion to rescue various credit markets;
* $620 billion for industrial nations, including the Bank of Canada, Bank of England, Bank of Japan, National Bank of Denmark, European Central Bank, Bank of Norway, Reserve Bank of Australia, Bank of Sweden, and Swiss National Bank;
* $120 billion in aid for emerging markets, including the central banks of Brazil, Mexico, South Korea and Singapore;
* Trillions to guarantee the FDIC’s new, expanded bank deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000; plus …
* More trillions for other sweeping guarantees.
The grand total? $7.8 trillion and counting!

This financial mess is but one of the tools they will use to scare the American people into accepting the North American Union and the Amero. I truly believe this whole mess has been orchestrated to manipulate the masses.

Get in line my little sheep. Baa Baa

Related posts

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Which Presidential Candidate Accepting Untraceable Donations?

October 29th, 2008 madmin Posted in Contributors, Democrats, In the News, Politics, Republican, The Issues No Comments »

Untraceable donations via prepaid credit cards – one candidate has found a loop-hole that may be used to evade limits on how much an individual is allowed to give.

Who is it? Take a guess then check out the Washington Post link; http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/28/AR2008102803413_pf.html.

I’m just surprised this hasn’t been revealed by the mainstream news organizations (again!).

Related posts

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Super Delegate Contributions (or Bribes?) Total About $890k

February 19th, 2008 madmin Posted in Contributors, Democrats, Politics, The Issues, Videos 1 Comment »

As reported by Political Intelligence of Boston.com, many of the Super Delegates who could well decide the Democratic presidential nominee have already been courted with campaign contributions by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

"While it would be unseemly for the candidates to hand out thousands of dollars to primary voters, or to the delegates pledged to represent the will of those voters, elected officials serving as Super Delegates have received about $890,000 from Obama and Clinton in the form of campaign contributions over the last three years," the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics reported 14-February-2008.

Obama’s political action committee has doled out more than $694,000 to Super Delegates since 2005, the study found, and of the 81 (Super Delegates) who had announced their support for Obama, 34 had received donations totaling $228,000.

Clinton’s political action committee has distributed about $195,000 to Super Delegates, and only 13 of the 109 who had announced for her have received money, totaling about $95,000.

So Obama has cumulatively outspent Clinton 2.4-to-1 on donating to supporting Super Delegates, but on a per Super Delegate basis, Clinton has exceeded Obama’s expenditure by $600 per person. In any case, a bit dishonest if you ask me – as close to legally buying a vote; legal, but dishonest.

Take a look at the video which describes the "invisible" battle for Super Delegate support.

 

Related posts

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton PAC Fundraising Violated – $850k to be Returned

September 10th, 2007 madmin Posted in Contributors, Corporate Greed & Politics, Democrats, Politics, The Issues No Comments »

Hillary’s HillPAC Political Action Committee fundraising contribution practices found with discrepancies under federal investigation…Hmm, and as Presidential-Race.net has been investigating her main PAC, more may be coming.

Stay tuned, visit the Presidential-Race.net investigation here, and read the whole story as posted on Yahoo.

******************

By LARA JAKES JORDAN, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 1 minute ago

WASHINGTON - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential campaign said Monday it will return $850,000 in donations raised by Democratic fundraiser Norman Hsu, who is under federal investigation for allegedly violating election laws.

Clinton, D-N.Y., previously had planned only to give to charity $23,000 she received from Hsu for her presidential and senatorial campaigns and to her political action committee, HillPac.

The FBI is investigating whether Hsu paid so-called straw donors to send campaign contributions to Clinton and other candidates, a law enforcement official said Monday.

"In light of recent events and allegations that Mr. Norman Hsu engaged in an illegal investment scheme, we have decided out of an abundance of caution to return the money he raised for our campaign," Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson said in a statement Monday night. "An estimated 260 donors this week will receive refunds totaling approximately $850,000 from the campaign."

Wolfson said the Clinton campaign also will vigorously review its fundraisers, including thorough criminal background checks, in the future. "In any instances where a source of a bundler’s income is in question, the campaign will take affirmative steps to verify its origin," he said.

The amount that the campaign identified as raised by Hsu would make him one of her top fundraisers. During the first six months of this year, her presidential campaign raised $52 million from individual contributors, second to Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., who raised $58.5 million.

Since 2004, Hsu has donated $260,000 to Democratic Party groups and federal candidates, and raised hundreds of thousands of additional dollars. He was regarded as a top party fundraiser until recent reports surfaced that he was wanted on a warrant in California in connection with a 1991 grand theft charge.

Federal authorities are looking into whether Hsu leaned on investors to contribute to political candidates after paying them big earnings from a shady business venture he was running, the law enforcement official said. Such a scam — using conduit contributors known as straw donors — is a violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act, which limits how much money individuals can give to candidates and political committees.

The FBI may be looking at other potential charges as well, according to the law enforcement official who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the ongoing investigation.

In addition to the $260,000 he contributed to federal candidates, Hsu also contributed at least $330,000 to state Democratic candidates and state party committees and ballot initiatives during the 2004 and 2006 election cycles. Among the state officials who received money were New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer and New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo. Both have said they would divest their campaigns of the donations.

Additionally, last week Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell said he would donate nearly $40,000 in contributions, and Rep. Mark Udall, D-Colo., said he had donated a $1,000 contribution to a charity that helps soldiers.

The purpose of Hsu’s business venture was unclear. The Los Angeles Times reported Monday that it was an investment pool that had recently drawn the suspicion of associates who questioned its legality.

An attorney for Hsu did not immediately respond to a request for comment Monday.

Hsu remained hospitalized in Grand Junction, Colo., where he has been since last week after failing to show up for a California court hearing. It was unclear when he might be returned to California to face the felony theft case.

Hsu pleaded no contest in 1991 to a grand theft charge that accused him of defrauding investors of $1 million. He was facing up to three years in prison when he skipped town before his sentencing in 1992. He finally surrendered to the arrest warrant Aug. 31, but disappeared before last week’s hearing where he was expected to turn over his passport and ask a judge to cut his $2 million bail in half.

Wolfson said the Clinton campaign was "unaware of Mr. Hsu’s decade-plus old warrant," despite what he described as a thorough review of public records.

Since Thursday, Hsu has been at the Colorado hospital, when he was taken from an eastbound Amtrak train for treatment of an undisclosed ailment. He’d failed to show up for the hearing a day earlier. He is expected to be taken to the Mesa County Jail in Colorado to await extradition proceedings in state court once he is well enough to leave the hospital.

***********

The whole story can be found at: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070910/ap_on_el_pr/democratic_fundraiser

Related posts

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

John McCain Campaign and Matching Funds

August 28th, 2007 madmin Posted in Contributors, Politics, Republican No Comments »

With a campaign in financial straits, the Arizona senator quietly requested authority to receive matching funds on Aug. 10, but his campaign said he has not decided whether he would ultimately accept the money. The Federal Election Commission has agreed McCain’s campaign is eligible to receive public financing for his struggling bid.

Doing so would put him at a major financial disadvantage against well-funded rivals Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney.

"We have not made a final decision, but we are doing what’s necessary should we decide to opt into the matching fund system," McCain spokeswoman Jill Hazelbaker said.

The FEC decision merely means that McCain has met the requirements to receive some amount of money – he could be elegible to receive about $6 million.

The one-time front-runner for the GOP nomination set out to raise $100 million or more this year and crafted a budget based on that assumption.  But the contributions failed to materialize.  $25 million was raised, and $23 million was used over the first 6 months of 2007.

But the money didn’t come in as expected and campaign spending was exorbitant. In the first six months of the year, the Arizona senator blew through $23 million of $25 million raised, a figure that didn’t include outstanding debt. All but broke by July, McCain’s campaign said it was seriously considering taking public matching funds and estimated that he could be eligible to receive about $6 million.  McCain has overhauled his national campaign, laid off dozens of staffers, installed new leadership and has refocused the campaign strategy on three states, Iowa, New Hampshire and >South Carolina.

Related posts

AddThis Social Bookmark Button




Page 1 of 212


-->